Joseph Tacopina and Chad Siegel treatment and “venus fly trap” remarkcould have been straight out of the rap songs that were filled with hatred and violence towards women...I remember the one about Tina Turner being one of the most offensive and like the rap singers a reminder that Joe Tacopina and Chad Siegel are being paid money to behave this way.
My first letter published in a newspaper happened to be in The Financial Times was about Lucien Freud’s painting of an older woman and her “flower power” and I related it to my art work and how globally from economics to basic human rights we still are lagging behind men.
Think of Chad Siegel’s Venus Fly Trap analogy. Did Tacopina script it? Did the two men chuckle about it? Does it reflect their own terrible anxiety, anger and great fear of women’s sexuality? What do you think?
I am an artist so you tell me. Does the PBA pay Tacopina’s salary and if so what percentage of that money is tax payer money? Do we have a right to know how much Tacopina and his “partner” really an underling based on Tacopina’s webpage where the front page is a love song to him alone?
Is the PBA going to rebuke their legal representatives for NYPD officer Moreno called the rape cop?
His lawyers are as awful as he is and I am glad the Judge said something but it is not enough.
As usual the highly bank rolled women’s groups all remain silent.
Chad Siegel at Joe Tacopino’s prompting is my guess did their venus fly trap verbal rape play and thought the judge would be sleeping. They hoped the jurors would be apathetic and they were confident that women’s groups would be silent. Ask Chad and Joe did they share a laugh together over the venus fly trap word play? They are not laughing now.
